🔗 Share this article

Are your professional networking connections viewing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on expanding your venture? Do recruiters reaching out to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation could be that you're not male.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Increased Reach

Dozens of female professionals joined a collective professional network test recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to include what they termed "bro-coded" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Brought Up

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Similar to most major social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which content are shown to which users - boosting some while reducing others.

Company Statement

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but claimed it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Instead, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts are received.

Changing gender on your profile does not affect how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

Simone Bonnett, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her name to "Simon E", described extraordinary outcomes.

"The statistics I'm seeing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after observing her audience decline significantly.

The Process

• First, she changed her gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rephrase her profile using "male-coded" language
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with similar "agentic" style

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Before, my posts were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and relatable," she explained. "Currently, the masculine version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She discontinued the test after seven days, stating "Each day I persisted, and results improved, I became angrier."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced favorable results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in specific cases or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on multiple factors, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "examinations of gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "This is evolving. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."